Category: Wildland

  • Massive Long Island, NY, Wildfires Prompt State of Emergency 

    Massive Long Island, NY, Wildfires Prompt State of Emergency 

    Two commercial buildings were damaged and two firefighters suffered minor injuries, Suffolk County Fire Coordinator Rudy Sunderman said.

    Credit: Joseph Wilkinson. New York Daily News

    All four Long Island brush fires that sent soaring plumes of smoke into the air had been contained by Sunday afternoon, authorities said.

    Two firefighters were hurt battling the blazes but released from the hospital by Sunday, Suffolk County Fire Coordinator Rudy Sunderman said. Two commercial buildings were also damaged, but no residential buildings were affected.

    The four fires combined to torch about 600 acres across the Pine Barrens in Suffolk County, according to County Executive Ed Romaine. More than 90 departments responded to the blazes to keep them away from major population centers.

    All roads that had been closed Saturday, including a 4-mile stretch of the Sunrise Highway, were reopened Sunday afternoon. Authorities are still investigating how the fires started, including the possibility of arson.

    “We’re going to get to the bottom of what happened,” Suffolk County Police Commissioner Kevin Catalina said. “At this time, it’s too early to tell whether or not this fire started naturally or there’s some nefarious origin.”

    Gov. Hochul implemented a burn ban beginning Sunday for New York City, Long Island and sections of the Hudson Valley, making it illegal to start an outdoor fire for brush and debris disposal.

    By Sunday afternoon, firefighting crews were focused on putting out hotspots and preventing flareups from the previous day’s blazes. However, the potential for new fires remained into Sunday, as wind gusts were expected to reach 25 mph and no precipitation was in the forecast.

    “New Yorkers are facing increased wildfire risks due to the combination of dry conditions and strong winds,” Hochul said. “As we work tirelessly to combat the fires in Suffolk County, we must all do our part to prevent further damage.”

  • FEMA cancels classes at national fire training academy amid federal funding cuts.

    FEMA cancels classes at national fire training academy amid federal funding cuts.

    CHICAGO (AP) — The country’s preeminent federal fire training academy canceled classes, effective immediately, on Saturday amid the ongoing flurry of funding freezesand staffing cuts by President Donald Trump’s administration.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency announced that National Fire Academy courses were canceled amid a “process of evaluating agency programs and spending to ensure alignment with Administration priorities,” according to a notice sent to instructors, students and fire departments. Instructors were told to cancel all future travel until further notice.

    Firefighters, EMS providers and other first responders from across the country travel to the NFA’s Maryland campus for the federally funded institution’s free training programs.

    “The NFA is a powerhouse for the fire service,” said Marc Bashoor, a former Maryland fire chief and West Virginia emergency services director with 44 years of fire safety experience. “It’s not a ‘nice to have.’ It is the one avenue we have to bring people from all over the country to learn from and with each other. If we want to continue to have one of the premier fire services in the world, we need to have the National Fire Academy.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The academy, which also houses the National Fallen Firefighter’s Memorial, opened in 1973 to combat a growing number of fatal fires nationwide. At the time, the National Commission on Fire Prevention and Control envisioned it to be the “West Point of the Fire Service,” according to a report form the organization.

    Bashoor said the NFA was set to welcome a new set of fire safety officers for training next week.

    “People had made their plane and travel reservations. And all of a sudden, they get an email that ‘Sorry, it’s been canceled,’” he said. “It’s really upsetting.”

    For firefighters, including those on the frontlines of deadly fires that ravaged California this year, having an essential training institution “shut down under the presumption that there’s waste, fraud and abuse” has been demoralizing, Bashoor said. He said losing NFA training could make the coordinated response that prevented additional deaths and destruction in California more difficult.

    FEMA and the National Fire Academy did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    While surveying disaster zones in California in January, Trump said he was considering “getting rid of” FEMA altogether, previewing sweeping changes to the nation’s central organization of responding to disasters.

    Firings at the U.S. Forest Service on the heels of the deadly California blazes also sparked outcry among discharged workers and officials who said it would mean fewer people and less resources will be available to help prevent and fight wildfires.

  • Los Angeles Fire Chief Wants Job Back, Appeals Firing

    Los Angeles Fire Chief Wants Job Back, Appeals Firing

    Fire Chief Kristin Crowley, who was fired last Friday, will have to get 10 of the 15 council members’ votes to be reinstated.

    Teresa Liu Los Angeles Daily News (TNS)

    Former Los Angeles Fire Chief Kristin Crowley announced on Thursday, Feb. 27, that she has formally appealed her removal by Mayor Karen Bass, escalating an already contentious political battle.

    The uphill fight now shifts to the City Council, where Crowley will need support from at least 10 of 15 council members to be reinstated–an outcome that remains highly uncertain.

    “Today I notified the City Council of my appeal as provided for in Los Angeles Charter, Article V, Section 5.08(e), due to Mayor Bass’s removal of me, on February 21, 2025, from the position of Fire Chief of the Los Angeles City Fire Department,” Crowley said in a statement.

    Shortly after Crowley’s appeal, Marqueece Harris-Dawson, leader of the 15-member City Council, scheduled a special meeting at 5 p.m. Friday, Feb. 28, at Van Nuys City Hall to hear Crowley’s appeal.

    However, later Thursday evening, his office announced that the meeting has been rescheduled to next Tuesday, March 4, at 10 a.m., to allow Crowley, interested parties and Councilmembers adequate time to prepare and attend.

    In the media advisory, which was sent just before 9 p.m., Harris-Dawson’s office said that, after receiving Crowley’s appeal, Harris-Dawson had directed city staff to prepare for a special Council meeting. Initiallly, the earliest available time for the meeting was determined to be Friday at 5 p.m.

    “While it is in the city’s best interest to hear this matter expeditiously, it is also important to allow the appellant, interested parties, and Councilmembers to be present and prepared for the meeting,” the statement read. “This matter will be heard in City Council on Tuesday, March 4th, at 10:00 a.m.”

    Harris-Dawson previously told City News Service that he urged Bass to “separate” from the chief.

    “We’re council members, so we don’t agree on everything,” Harris-Dawson told CNS. “I will say, I was one who was encouraging the mayor to separate with the chief weeks ago.”

    United Firefighters of Los Angeles City, or UFLAC, the union representing the city’s firefighters, blasted the decision in a statement to media Thursday evening, saying that it’s “outrageous” that the City Council has scheduled a special meeting on just 24-hour notice.

    “This is an example of why the public doesn’t trust City Hall and the constant missteps that we have seen our city leaders make since the fires broke out on January 7th,” the union said. “This is not transparent, fair, or just. It’s yet another public blunder coming out of City Hall that makes the people of Los Angeles continue to question the motives and trustworthiness of our city’s leaders.”

    Harris-Dawson along with Councilmembers Curren Price, Hugo Soto-Martinez and Adrin Nazarian – stood behind the mayor as she spoke. A couple of other councilmembers, including Councilmember Monica Rodriguez, has publicly indicated their support for Crowley to appeal her removal.

    Mayor’s spokesperson Zach Seidl said in a statement Thursday that “former Chief Crowley has the right to appeal her dismissal.”

    After the firing, the mayor’s office said Crowley had chosen to exercise “her Civil Service rights to stay with the Fire Department at a lower rank.” However, it remains unclear what position she has been assigned, as the mayor’s office did not directly answer that question Thursday.

    The move comes less than a week after Bass announced Crowley’s immediate removal and named former Chief Deputy Ronnie Villanueva, who recently retired, as interim fire chief.

    Bass cited Crowley’s refusal to submit an after-action report on the Palisades fire as a key reason for her removal.

    The mayor also criticized her handling of staffing decisions, saying that when the Palisades fires broke out on the morning of Jan.7, up to 1,000 firefighters could have been on duty but were instead sent home under Crowley’s leadership.

    “Let me be clear: our firefighters acted heroically during the Palisades fire, and they act heroically every single day. That is without question. Bringing new leadership to the fire department is what they and the people of Los Angeles deserve,” Bass said during a Feb. 21 press conference announcing Crowley’s removal.

    Under the City Charter, Crowley has 10 calendar days to appeal her firing to the L.A. City Council. The council could overturn Bass’ action if two-thirds of the governing body – meaning 10 of the 15 council members – vote to reverse the mayor’s decision.

    The political turmoil has been building for weeks, with Crowley criticizing the city and Bass firing back. In an interview soon after the Eaton and Palisades fires erupted, Crowley said the city had “failed” her and the fire department by making budget cuts that hampered firefighters’ ability to respond to the recent deadly wildfires.

    Bass, meanwhile, has reportedly blamed Crowley and others, saying that if she had been properly informed about the severity of last month’s windstorms, she would not have traveled out of the country just days before the first wildfire erupted.

  • CAL FIRE Overhauls Wildfire Risk Maps that May Result in Stricter Rules 

    CAL FIRE Overhauls Wildfire Risk Maps that May Result in Stricter Rules 

    Researchers use models that combine how weather, topography and types of vegetation raise the risk that a fire will grow large and threaten neighborhoods.

    Julie Johnson, Sriharsha Devulapalli San Francisco Chronicle

    Feb. 25—With streaks of yellow, orange and red, Cal Fire’s new fire risk maps make plain the extent of fire danger in the Bay Area.

    The origin of the maps date back to one of the first major wildfires to burn into neighborhoods in the state: the 1980 Panorama Fire in San Bernardino County. That fire triggered extensive research into which types of homes burned and which survived. Shake roofs made from wood shingles, for example, made homes especially vulnerable to flying embers.

    Cal Fire’s maps, which are still in draft form, establish what the state calls fire hazard severity zones, which measure the likelihood of a major wildfire hitting certain areas and neighborhoods. State and local governments require homeowners to follow stricter building codes and landscape rules in some zones — such as banning more wood shake roofs in the riskiest areas.

    What do these maps tell communities about fire risk?

    Cal Fire’s maps characterize the threat of a potential fire that ignites in the wildland and comes into communities, said Dave Sapsis, a research manager with Cal Fire who was part of the technical team that developed the model.

    They use models that combine how weather, topography and types of vegetation raise the risk that a fire, once ignited, will grow large and threaten neighborhoods. Steep terrain and eucalyptus trees, for example, add to fire risk.

    But the maps have limits. They do not yet incorporate data for what happens once a wildfire becomes a true urban conflagration spreading from home to home, according to Sapsis.

    “They’re modeling a buffer from the wildland to urban areas to account for ember cast,” he said.

    He said that scientific models for urban conflagrations are still being developed.

    The maps also aren’t meant to show that there is no risk from wildfires in areas not designated in a fire zone, and they focus on the heightened risk for places close to forests, grasslands, parks and other open spaces.

    “The closer you are to that wildland edge, the higher the hazard is,” Sapsis said. “The more likely that wildfire that impinges will make it to you.”

    Do Cal Fire’s maps require residents to make immediate changes to their properties?

    No. Homeowners generally do not have to act until they make big changes, like when properties are built, renovated, purchased or sold. That’s when stricter building codes kick in requiring better roofs, fine mesh vents, multi-pane windows and fire-resistant siding to be installed.

    Cal Fire provides a basic outline of the various codes.

    The primary audience for the maps are city and county governments, and especially permitting departments, which inform residents about rules for the projects they undertake. For governments, the maps guide planning and development, and inform infrastructure requirements, such as those for roads.

    But these zones could eventually impact a vast number of California yards.

    The California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection is drafting new rules for the area within five feet of homes. The current plan is to ban most plants (apart from mature trees) and flammable materials like bark mulch and wood fencing within the five feet of residential structures. Studies have shown that embers that land in this area are less likely to set the home on fire if there isn’t material there to burn.

    Called an ember-resistant zone, or “zone zero,” the rules would apply only in “very high” fire hazard severity zones in areas generally protected by local fire departments and in all areas listed on the maps as state responsibility protected by Cal Fire. Residents would not have to comply right away. Once adopted, zone zero requirements would first apply to newly built homes and then to existing properties three years after they are enacted.

    Where did fire risk grow?

    Some cities in the Bay Area gained more acres in the highest tiers of fire risk, including San Jose, Orinda and Half Moon Bay as well as counties including Sonoma and Napa, where multiple major wildfires have broken out in recent years.

    In Sausalito, fire risk now extends nearly to the shoreline, according to Cal Fire’s map. The city has about 702 acres in one of the three fire hazard severity zones, whereas it had none listed in the earlier maps released between 2007 and 2011.

    Marshall Nau, deputy fire marshal with the Southern Marin Fire Protection District, said the city’s steep terrain, dense neighborhoods and thick vegetation make it particularly fire-prone given the community’s proximity to wild open spaces.

    The fire district considers fire risk to extend even further into the flatlands than Cal Fire’s maps show.

    Nau said that he’s tried to reassure the many callers to the district who are more worried since the fires in Los Angeles. Residents can harden their homes in meaningful ways with fire-resistant materials and by clearing flammable brush away from structures, he said.

    “We’re trying to bring the anxiety down so people can think clearly and take action,” Nau said.

    What areas in the region show less fire risk?

    Cities including Oakland, Berkeley, El Cerrito and Hillsborough have fewer acres designated in fire hazard severity zones.

    In Berkeley, Cal Fire’s new modeling decreased the number of acres listed as having “very high” fire risk from 1,269 to 454. Some of those acres were spread into lower tiered categories, high and moderate.

    Berkeley Fire Chief David Sprague said he was surprised to see homes along Panoramic Hill mostly designated as “moderate,” though the city considers this area to be at a major disadvantage should a wildfire ignite. The neighborhoods are densely packed on steep terrain with thick vegetation. Many of the homes are over 100 years old and weren’t made with modern fire-safe standards. Evacuation routes are very limited.

    “Cleary, that’s not accurate,” Sprague said.

    Cal Fire’s map is just a draft. Local jurisdictions will submit feedback and Cal Fire is expected to finalize the maps at some point later this year.

    When will Cal Fire release the next batch of fire risk maps?

    The maps released Monday covered cities and towns protected by local fire departments in 17 counties in the San Francisco Bay Area and along Northern California’s coast.

    Cal Fire will release another batch of maps March 10 covering central California including Sacramento, and then a final group of maps covering Southern California will be published March 24.

    Cal Fire published fire hazard severity zone maps for the areas of the state it protects , which includes most but not all of unincorporated California.

  • Vital Details Linger Month after Start of Deadly CA Wildfires

    Vital Details Linger Month after Start of Deadly CA Wildfires

    While the cause of the firestorm is being investigated by the ATF, one started Jan. 7 and spread rapidly due to hurricane-force winds.

    Credit. Firehouse.com

    The first column of black smoke rose from the hills above Pacific Palisades just after 10 a.m. on Jan. 7. A fire in that location so close to homes would bring alarm on any day. But on this one, the Santa Ana winds were reaching hurricane force.

    It was the beginning of one of the most momentous, destructive and tragic days in Los Angeles County history.

    The Palisades fire went on to char 23,707 acres in the area of Pacific Palisades, Topanga and Malibu. More than 6,800 structures were destroyed, including many residences and iconic businesses along Pacific Coast Highway and homes in the hills above. At least 12 people were killed.

    The Eaton fire, which erupted hours later in Altadena, burned 14,021 acres in and around Altadena and Pasadena, razing more than 9,400 structures and claiming 17 lives. It took a heavy toll on the historically Black community of Altadena, where many families of color had used their homes to accumulate generational wealth.

    A month later, the crisis of the fire has given way to recovery, cleanup and talk of rebuilding.

    But questions remain about what happened that day and what we can learn from it. Here are some key points from the pages of The Times’ fire coverage:

    What do we know about the cause of the Palisades fire?

    The fires broke out near a popular hiking trail at around 10:30 a.m. Jan. 7 and spread rapidly into Pacific Palisades and Malibu amid hurricane-force winds.

    A team of investigators from the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is trying to determine the cause of the firestorm.

    The ATF has not commented on the investigation. But sources say one area of scrutiny is whether an 8-acre blaze that fire officials thought they had put out on Jan. 1 in the same area reignited and spread due to the intense wind.

    The Lachman fire was reported at 12:17 a.m. New Year’s Day on a hillside above Pacific Palisades by a resident whose home is about two blocks from the popular Skull Rock trail. Sources with knowledge of the investigation who were not authorized to speak publicly told The Times the Lachman fire appeared to have been sparked by fireworks.

    Water-dropping helicopters initially were not able to fly because of strong winds, according to the agency. But around 1:40 a.m., an aerial attack was launched to support crews on the ground. News footage captured the charge, with walls of flames towering over homes and firefighters with hoses running into backyards.

    Shortly after 3:30 a.m., fire officials reported they had stopped forward progress of the blaze.

    A little over an hour later, the Los Angeles Fire Department reported that firefighters had “completed the hose line around the perimeter of the fire and it is fully contained.” However, some firefighters remained at the site to mop up and ensure the fire didn’t flare up again.

    But sources told The Times last week a final determination had not been made and that it was still possible the blaze started on Jan. 7.

    What was the cause of the Eaton fire?

    The blaze, which burned large swaths of Altadena, is being investigated by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.

    The early focus has been on Southern California Edison power lines in Eaton Canyon, where the fire began after 6 p.m. on Jan. 7.

    Soon after the fire, Edison came under scrutiny because of photos and videos taken by Eaton Canyon residents that showed a fire burning under a transmission tower just as the blaze started.

    Last week, Edison revealed that its lines over Eaton Canyon saw a momentary increase of electrical current about the same time as the fire began. In a filing to California regulators on Jan. 27, Edison said a fault occurred on the Eagle Rock-Gould line, which connects the Eagle Rock substation to the Gould substation in La Cañada Flintridge.

    The fault occurred about five circuit miles from the area where the fire started and caused an increase of current across the company’s transmission lines.

    On Thursday, Edison went a step further, acknowledging that videos and other evidence suggested the company’s equipment might have played a role. The company added that so far, however, it “has not identified typical or obvious indications that would support this association, such as broken conductors, fresh arc marks in the preliminary origin area, or evidence of faults on the energized lines running through the area.”

    “While we do not yet know what caused the Eaton wildfire, SCE is exploring every possibility in its investigation, including the possibility that SCE’s equipment was involved,” said Pedro J. Pizarro, president and CEO of SCE’s parent company, Edison International.

    More than 40 lawsuits from over 600 residents have been filed against Southern California Edison accusing the utility and its equipment of igniting the blaze.

    What was the cause of the Hurst fire?

    Southern California Edison reported to state regulators Thursday that its equipment likely sparked the Hurst fire that burned nearly 800 acres in Sylmar.

    What do we know about the fire evacuations?

    The evacuations for both the Palisades and Eaton fires have been the subject of criticism.

    A Times investigation of the Eaton fire showed it took almost nine hours for a large swath of Altadena west of North Lake Avenue to receive electronic evacuation orders. By then, several fires had been reported in that area, and many residents say they watched in horror as flames rapidly approached their homes. Of the 17 people who died, all lived west of North Lake Avenue.

    A Times review of the Palisades fire found the challenge of evacuating thousands of residents was compounded by delayed alerts and overwhelmed first responders. Residents told The Times they felt as if they were left to fend for themselves. Streets were gridlocked at least 40 minutes before the first widespread evacuation order. As flames approached, firefighters and police told motorists to get out and run. The abandoned cars worsened the jam and prevented first responders from getting through. Residents trapped by blocked roads said they were forced to shelter in place.

    What do we know about fire preparations?

    A Times investigation revealed that Los Angeles Fire Department officials made the critical decision to forgo calling in scores of extra firefighters and equipment in the hours before the Palisades fire.

    The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power has also come under scrutiny because a key Pacific Palisades reservoir was empty due to maintenance when the Palisades fire broke out. Gov. Gavin Newsom ordered an investigation into the matter.

    Water pressure was another issue, with fire hydrants running dry in both Pacific Palisades and Altadena. Officials said water systems that supply neighborhoods simply don’t have the capacity to deliver such large volumes of water over several hours. As fires grow larger and more intense in the West, essential questions are being raised, including: Should storage tanks and other local water infrastructure be expanded to contend with wildfires? Where? And at what cost?

  • San Diego firefighters try chemically-safe spray to prevent brush fires

    San Diego firefighters try chemically-safe spray to prevent brush fires

    Officials estimate that around half of the 4,000 gallons has been sprayed on more than 40 fire-prone acres, including at least six places where homeless people have been known to camp

    By Blake Nelson – The San Diego Union-Tribune

    SAN DIEGO — The firefighter pulled the black hose down a hill.

    “Good?” she called out.

    “All the way down,” a voice responded.

    Brea Kirklen kept walking. Below her were the remnants of a homeless encampment in a small canyon by San Diego’s Valencia Park neighborhood. While the county had recently gotten some rain, the sun was again out and baking the foliage on Tuesday afternoon. Kirklen stopped a few feet from the bottom, aimed the hose’s nozzle upward and squeezed a trigger.

    The clear liquid that shot out toward leaves and debris alike was a citrus-based fire retardant called Citrotech that leaders hope will limit the size of any future blazes, including those started by people living outside. Officials began spraying brush along evacuation routes last year and added probable encampment spots to the list in January, all of which should now be less likely to ignite for the next several months.

    This approach to fire prevention is new for both San Diego and the nation: The company making Citrotech, Mighty Fire Breaker, only launched a few years ago and is in the early stages of selling cities on the spray, according to records filed with the federal government.

    “I’ve never seen anything else like it,” said Tony Tosca, a deputy chief at the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department.

    A central part of the pitch is that, in contrast to many cancer-linked chemicals that firefighters have long relied on, Citrotech won’t kill you. It shouldn’t even bother the plants. The company on its website touts the use of “environmentally benign chemicals” that are “safe to use around our homes, schools, pets and children.”

    In 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency gave the company an award for using safer ingredients. One caveat: Mighty Fire Breaker notes online that the award is not the same thing as an endorsement, nor did the EPA conduct its own tests of the spray. The agency instead relied on the company for “information on the product’s composition, ingredients, and attributes.”

    The San Diego Union-Tribune asked the organization for a list of ingredients and information about its safety tests. Steve Conboy, founder and president of Mighty Fire Breaker California, responded in an email that the spray is made with water and “food grade constituents” pulled from the EPA’s “Safer Chemical Ingredients List.” He sent a link to the agency’s directory of safe chemicals.

    Regarding safety checks, Conboy said they’d run 90 aquatic tests at a lab in Ventura and that the U.S. Forest Service had spent months confirming the substance didn’t hurt trout or mammals. (The forest service did not immediately return requests for comment.)

    San Diego’s fire department appears to be the only one nationwide that’s widely employing the spray. Conboy was not aware of others.

    San Diego used a nearly $367,000 state grant to buy about 4,000 gallons of Citrotech. Officials estimate that around half has so far been sprayed on more than 40 fire-prone acres, including at least six places where homeless people have been known to camp. (Firefighters wait until after city crews clear the area.) The grant also helped pay for equipment to distribute Citrotech, including a Ford F250 pickup.

    All of the sprayed sites can be tracked online through a publicly available map.

    Now comes the monitoring. The fire department didn’t create a full environmental impact report before work began — city officials decided the pilot program was limited enough to be exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act — but staffers are now watching to see if the spray has any effect on local plants and animals.

    Firefighters will additionally track whether fewer fires begin in areas covered by Citrotech, or if future blazes stop spreading once they reach a treated area. Hopes are high. One video from the company shows a pile of sprayed wood chips refusing to ignite despite being surrounded by roaring flames, and the product’s fans include Jeff Bowman, a former San Diego fire chief who’s now listed as a member of Mighty Fire Breaker’s advisory board.

    If results are good, leaders are open to buying more.

    Officials say dozens of recent blazes likely originated in encampments, and police officers are now supposed to report any fire-starting material they find outside so supervisors can alert both clean-up crews and firefighters, who should then come by to spray the site, according to acting Lt. Brent DeVore.

    Kirklen, the San Diego firefighter, moved the nozzle back and forth over the canyon on Tuesday. The air smelled faintly of hand sanitizer, although some observers said they couldn’t detect any odor. The area had certainly burned before: A short walk away were more than three dozen palm trees with blackened trunks.

    After a minute or so, Kirklen switched off the spray, trudged back up the hill and shot out some more. The whole operation took maybe 15 minutes. An estimated 10 gallons had been used.

    Sitting in a tent across the street was 33-year-old Geryl Andrews. Andrews had been living around the canyon for about a month, following the loss of a job and some “poor decision making,” he said.

    Andrews had started fires at night, but nothing that burned out of control, he added. The name Citrotech was new to him. He hadn’t known that the spray was now on nearby trees, and a reporter asked whether Andrews was still comfortable camping in the area.

    “I do want more information,” he said.

    ©2025 The San Diego Union-Tribune.
    Visit sandiegouniontribune.com.
    Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

  • Record Number of Dead Trees Could Lead to Deadly CA Wildfire Season

    Record Number of Dead Trees Could Lead to Deadly CA Wildfire Season

    Feb. 7, 2023 Roughly 36.3 million dead trees were counted across California last year, a dramatic increase from previous years.

    By Nathan Solis Source Los Angeles Times (TNS) Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

    SHASTA LAKE, CA - SEPTEMBER 30: California's years-long drought has dropped the water level at Shasta Lake on Friday, Sept. 30, 2022 in Shasta Lake, CA
    SHASTA LAKE, CA – SEPTEMBER 30: California’s years-long drought has dropped the water level at Shasta Lake on Friday, Sept. 30, 2022 in Shasta Lake, CA

    Roughly 36.3 million dead trees were counted across California last year, a dramatic increase from previous years that experts are blaming on drought, insects and disease, according to a report by the U.S. Forest Service.

    The same survey last year counted 9.5 million dead trees in the state, but the effects of the dramatic tree die off this year are more severe and spread across a wider range, according to the report released Tuesday.

    The aerial report paints a bleak picture of a state ravaged by drought, disease and insects that feed and nest in thirsty trees. From mid-July to early October, researchers surveyed nearly 40 million acres including federal, state and private land. They found dead trees spread across 2.6 million acres.

    True fir trees were hardest hit, with 3 million dead Douglas-fir trees counted across 190,000 acres, primarily in the central Sierra Nevada Range. There were just 170,000 dead trees counted across 18,000 acres the previous year, with this year’s numbers representing a 1,650% increase, according to the report authors.

    There were 15 million dead red fir trees counted across 890,000 acres and another 12 million white fir counted across 1.5 million acres. Both represented considerable increases to the previous year’s findings and were grouped mainly around the Northern California city of Redding, including the Shasta-Trinity National Forest and surrounding areas.

    Drought conditions have exacerbated disease and insect infestations. Overcrowded forests choked with dead trees and abnormally high temperatures have also played a key role in the increased mortality, according to forest officials.

    In 2016, at the heights of a historic drought in California, federal and state agencies counted nearly 62 million dead trees. The following year saw a drop to 27 million dead trees and by 2019 surveyors counted 15 million dead trees.

    The primary cause is the state’s multi-year drought.

    Roughly 80% of the state experienced severe drought conditions at the start of the year, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor. Thanks to a series of winter rain storms the latest data shows that figure has dropped to just 32%.

    But forest officials say that despite all that rain, the increase in dead trees will continue to be a problem for years to come as rain levels continue to remain low.

    Forest management will play a key role in how the state responds to tree mortality, according to officials.

    “Forest health is a top priority for the Forest Service,” Jennifer Eberlein, regional forester with the U.S. Forest Service for the Pacific Southwest region, said in a statement.

    The agency’s 10-year plan to tackle the problem will include removing dead and dying trees in areas where they pose the most risk to the surrounding communities.

    Northern California saw several deadly, fast-moving wildfires in 2022 including the Mosquito Fire in Placer County and the McKinney Fire in Siskiyou County. Northern California also saw more dead trees than any other parts of the state.

    The number of homes and other structures that have been burned in the Western United States has increased over the last 11 years when compared with the previous decade, according to a study published earlier this month in Proceedings of the National Academy of Science-Nexus. There was a nearly 250% increase in homes and structures destroyed, while wildfires became significantly more destructive over the last decade, according to the study’s findings.

    The primary takeaway is that more homes and outbuildings were destroyed in California by human-caused fires over a 22-year period.

    This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.

  • Numerous wildfire-related bills have been introduced in Congress

    Numerous wildfire-related bills have been introduced in Congress

    Summaries of 14 still pending

    It seems like in the last year there has been more wildfire-related legislation introduced in Congress than in previous years. It’s hard to say why, but it could be related to a growing number of megafires, more communities destroyed, and increased activism in the wildland firefighter community.

    Of course simply introducing legislation accomplishes nothing if it does not become law, except perhaps providing a talking point for the politician’s next reelection campaign. A cynic might suggest that some bills are introduced and press releases issued by members of Congress with no hope or expectation that they will pass. But it is difficult to tell which are real and which are vaporware.

    With that in the back of our minds, here is a partial list of 15 bills and the dates they were introduced which have not passed in this 117th United States Congress (2021-2022). Only a few have made it to the committee hearing stage, and none have progressed beyond that.

    H.R. 5631 — Tim Hart Wildland Firefighter Classification and Pay Parity Act. October 19, 2021. (Rep. Joe Neguse). This bill has numerous provisions, including raising firefighter pay, creating a wildland firefighter job series, providing health care and mental health services to temporary and permanent wildland firefighters, housing stipends, and other items. (More details are in the Wildfire Today article from October 19, 2021.)

    H.R.5010 — FIRE Act. August 13, 2021. (Rep. Mike Garcia) This bill directs the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), in collaboration with the U.S. weather industry and and academic partners, to establish a program within NOAA to improve wildfire forecasting and detection.

    H.R.2585 — FIRE Act of 2021. April 1,5 2021 (Rep. Dusty Johnson) Timber salvage sales. No later than 60 days after a wildfire is contained on such lands (1) the Forest Service, to the maximum extent practicable, shall complete a survey of the lands that were impacted by such wildfire; and (2) the Department of Agriculture (USDA) shall convert the timber sales applicable to such lands that were impacted by such wildfire to salvage sales. The bill designates a categorical exclusion for forest management activities where the primary purpose of the activity is for roadside salvage activities that allow for the removal of hazard trees that are within 200 feet of a roadway center line. Activities carried out pursuant to this bill shall be subject to judicial review in the same manner as authorized hazardous fuels reduction projects. A court may not order a preliminary injunction enjoining the USDA from proceeding with timber sales authorized under this bill.

    S.3092 — FIRE Act. October 27, 2021. (Sen. Alex Padilla) The bill would, according to Senator Padilla, update the Stafford Act that governs FEMA—which was written when the agency primarily focused on hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods—to improve FEMA’s response to wildfires, including by accounting for “melted infrastructure” and burned trees as well as allowing FEMA to pre-deploy assets during times of highest wildfire risk and red flag warnings. The bill would also ensure cultural competency for FEMA’s counseling and case management services, help to ensure relocation assistance is accessible to public infrastructure in fire prone areas, prioritize survivors’ housing needs after disasters, ensure equity of assistance for tribal communities and tribal governments, and examine ways to speed up the federal assistance process and improve the availability of fire insurance. More info.

    S.1734 — National Prescribed Fire Act of 2021. May 20, 2021. (Sen. Ron Wyden). The bill would appropriate $300 million each to the Departments of the Interior (DOI) and Agriculture (DOA) to increase the pace and scale of controlled burns on state, county, and federally managed lands. It sets an annual target of at least one million acres treated with prescribed fire by federal agencies, but not to exceed 20 million. It requires the two departments to hire additional employees. Overtime payments for prescribed fire could be paid out of wildfire suppression accounts. More info.

    S.138 — Wildland Firefighter Pay Act. January 28, 2021. (Sen. Dianne Feinstein.) It would raise the maximum limit on overtime pay for federal firefighters. The current limit affects higher level employees at the GS-12 and above level, and some GS-11s depending on if they are exempt from the provisions in the Fair Labor Standards Act. Under the existing provisions if they work hundreds of hours of overtime they may reach the cap after which they earn no more money. In some cases later in the fire season employees who spent a lot of time fighting fires have been told they earned too much and were forced to pay some of it back. More info.

    S.1116 — Federal Firefighters Fairness Act of 2021. April 14, 2021 (Sen. Thomas Carper.) Establishes for federal workers certain medical conditions as presumptive illnesses. Specifically, the bill provides that (1) heart disease, lung disease, and specified cancers of federal employees employed in fire protection activities for at least 5 years are presumed to be proximately caused by such employment if the employee is diagnosed with the disease within 10 years of employment; and (2) the disability or death of the employee due to such disease is presumed to result from personal injury sustained in the performance of duty. These presumptions also apply to fire protection employees (regardless of the length of employment) who contract any communicable disease at the center of a designated pandemic or any chronic infectious disease that the Department of Labor determines is related to job-related hazards.

    H.R.6336 — Western Wildfire Support Act of 2021. December 20, 2021. (Joe Neguse.) Establishes a program to train and certify citizens who wish to be able to volunteer to assist USDA or Interior during a wildland fire incident, and a program to award grants to eligible states or units of local government to acquire slip-on tank and pump units for a surge capacity of resources for fire suppression. It requires the Joint Fire Science Program to carry out research and development of unmanned aircraft system fire applications.

    S.2419 — Wildfire Smoke Emergency Declaration Act of 2021. (Sen. Jeff Merkley.) This bill authorizes the President to declare a smoke emergency and provide emergency assistance to affected communities under specified circumstances. Specifically, the President, upon determining that there is, or anticipating that there will be, a significant decrease in air quality due to wildland fire smoke in one or more states, may declare a smoke emergency. The governor or other agency of a state that is or will be affected may request such a declaration. If the President declares a smoke emergency, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and other federal agencies may provide emergency assistance to states and local communities that are or will be affected by the emergency, including grants, equipment, supplies, and personnel and resources for establishing smoke shelters, air purifiers, and additional air monitoring sites. The Small Business Administration may provide grants to any small business concern that loses a significant amount of revenue due to wildland fire smoke in an area in which the President has declared a smoke emergency.

    S.2661 — Smoke-Ready Communities Act of 2021. August 5, 2021. (Sen. Jeff Merkley) Provides funding for infrastructure upgrades to public buildings to filter out wildfire smoke. It would also assist with local efforts to provide health information about wildfire smoke.

    S.2421 — Smoke Planning and Research Act. July 21, 2021. (Sen. Jeff Merkley.) It would make available each year $80 million to fund research on the public health impacts of wildfire smoke and create a grant program for local community planning relating to wildfire smoke.

    H.R.4614 — Resilient Federal Forests Act. (Rep. Bruce Westerman) Primarily related to the logging industry, it streamlines or avoids compliance with some requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act by establishing numerous categorical exclusions for projects on National Forest System and public lands. It does away with many of the environment regulations a logging company must satisfy before a timber sale takes place.

    S.487 — 21st Century Conservation Corps Act. (Sen. Ron Wyden.) The bill would provide funds to support a natural resource management and conservation workforce and bolster wildfire prevention and preparedness. Establishes a $9 billion fund for qualified land and conservation corps to increase job training and hiring specifically for jobs in the woods, helping to restore public lands and provide jobs in a time of need. Provides an additional $3.5 billion for the U.S. Forest Service and $2 billion for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to support science-based projects aimed at improving forest health and reducing the risk of catastrophic wildfire. Establishes a $2 billion fund to provide economic relief for outfitters and guides holding U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Department of the Interior special use permits. Provides $2 billion for the National Fire Capacity program, which helps the Forest Service implement FireWise, to prevent, mitigate, and respond to wildfire around homes and businesses on private land. Provides $2 billion for the FEMA Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities (BRIC) program to improve resiliency for communities impacted by wildfire. Provides $6 billion for U.S. Forest Service, $6 billion for the National Park Service, and $2 billion for the Bureau of Land Management maintenance accounts to create jobs, reduce the maintenance backlog, and expand access to recreation. More information.

    S.2650 — Wildfire Resilient Communities Act. August 5, 2021. (Sen. Jeff Merkley.)  Sets aside $30 billion for the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management to boost catastrophic wildfire reduction projects. Provides financial and technical assistance to at-risk communities adjacent to Federal land, including through States, to assist the at-risk communities in planning and preparing for wildfire, including cosponsoring and supporting the expansion of the Firewise USA program, the Ready, Set, Go program, and the Living with Wildfire program.

  • CA Wildfire Flames Reach Famed Giant Forest

    CA Wildfire Flames Reach Famed Giant Forest

    The KNP Complex fires in Sequoia National Park have entered the famed Giant Forest area, home to the General Sherman and other cherished towering sequoias.

    September 19, 2021 – By Michael Cabanatuan – Source San Francisco Chronicle

    Sep. 18—Flames from the KNP Complex fires in Sequoia National Park entered the famed Giant Forest area, home to the General Sherman and other named and cherished towering sequoias Friday.

    Mark Garrett, a fire information officer, told The Chronicle he was heading to the grove of sequoias when he had to turn around as fire crossed the General’s Highway and neared the Giant Forest. Some of the crews clearing brush and doing controlled burns also fled the area, he said.

    “It looks like the two fires merged into one and are going into Giant Forest,” he said, referring to the Colony and Paradise fires that make up the KNP Complex in the national park and surrounding national forests.

    The General Sherman and the other tallest and most famous trees are partially wrapped in foil and encircled by protective barriers carved into the earth.

    Fire officials said they were confident that the Giant Forest, about 3 square miles and containing about 2,000 sequoias, is well-protected against the flames with the floor of the forest cleared of most debris and a long history of prescribed burns to reduce fuel in the area.

    “The General Sherman is wrapped and so are a lot of the other named trees,” Garrett said. “The others are at least raked and cleared around the bases so the fires won’t burn up to the canopies.”

    During a town hall meeting in Three Rivers ( Tulare County), a fire official said firefighters were concerned about preventing the roots and bases of the giant trees as well as existing burn scars on their bark — known as “cat faces” — from catching fire.

    The fire is moving northeast toward the Lodgepole area, where the park has a visitor center, campground, restaurants and housing for park employees, who’ve been evacuated. Structure protection crews have been hard at work in the area for the past couple of days, Garrett said.

    Fire officials assured residents living south of the fire that while the tall trees are getting the most media attention, they’re prepared to evacuate communities and protect homes and businesses if the winds shift and the fire shifts direction.

    The KNP Complex, a collection of fires ignited by lightning Sept. 10, had consumed 11,365 acres, growing by more than 4,000 acres in a day, and was 0% contained at midday Friday. The flames continued to advance toward the grove of giant sequoias and were expected to burn into the forest Saturday or Sunday, according to firefighters.

    The General Sherman stands 275 feet tall and has a diameter of about 36 feet at its base. It takes about 20 people joining hands to encircle it. While its rank among the titans of trees is often debated, it is considered the largest tree by volume and the world’s biggest sequoia. Some California coastal redwoods are taller. The General Sherman is estimated to be 2,300 to 2,700 years old.

    Fire crews on Thursday wrapped the base of the General Sherman and some other sequoias in the Giant Forest area with an aluminum insulation wrap to protect them from the flames. The trees have apparently been wrapped all the way around and up about 10 feet, though photographs released by the National Park Service show only part of the wrapping.

    Wrapping the giant trees around their bases helps prevent damage to the cambium, a layer of the tree inside its thick bark, by protecting it against lingering fire burning on the ground, said Joanna Nelson, Save the Redwoods League’s director of science and conservation planning.

    In addition to the foil wraps, crews have also dug protective lines around the giant trees and set controlled fires to clear some of the underbrush, debris and dried fuel in the 5-square-mile Giant Forest, home to about 2,000 soaring sequoias and the national park’s top attraction.

    Steve Bumgardner, a videographer and former ranger, firefighter and tour guide in the park for more than 20 years, said the storied grove of trees is likely to survive the fire because the area has been well managed, including with controlled fires, for decades.

    “If any grove can handle a fire it’s the Giant Forest,” he said. “It has had 50 years of prescribed burns.”

    Nelson declined to speculate on the fate of the General Sherman but said she expects it will be well protected.

    “The General Sherman has the aluminum wrap and will be defended by firefighters,” Nelson said. “There are specific trees that call out for special protection. When you’re famous as a tree, you get special care.”

    But the weather appears to be changing, with onshore winds from the west picking up speed and pushing the flames, according to the Forest Service. Afternoon and evening winds of 15 to 25 mph are forecast with gusts of up to 40 mph.

    To the south of the KNP Complex in Sequoia National Forest, the Windy Fire on Friday had grown to 6,849 acres with 0% containment. Residents of the Tule River Indian Reservation and areas nearby were urged to monitor the fire’s progress.

    That fire has prompted evacuation orders for two communities and burned into a portion of the Peyrone Sequoia Grove, forest officials reported — though because the area is inaccessible, an assessment of the damage to giant sequoia trees may take days to complete.

    In northeastern California, the Dixie Fire burning across five counties was at 960,641 acres and 88% contained on Friday. The Caldor Fire near Lake Tahoe was 218,876 acres and 71% contained.

    (c)2021 the San Francisco Chronicle

    Visit the San Francisco Chronicle at www.sfchronicle.com

    Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

  • Pandemic Hitting Wildland FFs Harder This Year

    Pandemic Hitting Wildland FFs Harder This Year

    As wildfires rage across Western states, COVID-19 cases and pandemic-related supply chain issues have made it harder to deploy firefighting resources.

    September 17, 2021 – By Sophie Quinton – Source Stateline.org

    As wildfires rage across Western states, flattening rural towns and forcing thousands of people to evacuate, coronavirus cases and pandemic-related supply chain problems have made it harder to deploy firefighting resources to where they’re needed, fire officials say.

    More firefighters appear to be falling ill with COVID-19 and quarantining this year than last year, the officials say, because of the highly contagious delta variant and mixed adherence to COVID-19 safety measures such as masking, vaccinations and social distancing.

    “Last year, I actually was incredibly, pleasantly surprised by how little COVID it seemed like we had,” said Melissa Baumann, president of the National Federation of Federal Employees’ Forest Service Council. Her union represents U.S. Forest Service employees, including wildland firefighters who work for the agency.

    “I did not hear of whole [fire] crews going down, right and left,” she said. “I’m hearing that this year.”

    In addition to the extra stress it puts on fire crews, the uptick in cases has alarmed some officials in Western states, who say fire-prone communities need all the help they can get to fend off dangerous blazes.

    “On the fire line and in camps, COVID-19 not only threatens the health of firefighters but our ability to deploy critical firefighting resources to the fire lines,” wrote Washington state’s commissioner of public lands, Hilary Franz, to the U.S. secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior last month. “At a time when we need them the most, we cannot afford to have any get sick.”

    Four or five wildland firefighters have died from complications of the virus this year, said Burk Minor, executive director of the Wildland Firefighter Foundation, a Boise, Idaho-based group that supports families of such firefighters killed in the line of duty. “I don’t recall any fatalities from COVID last year,” he said.

    National fire leaders are collecting data on COVID-19 activity associated with large fires, and some government agencies are tracking when their employees get sick. But there’s no publicly available data on the total number of wildland firefighters nationwide who have fallen ill with COVID-19 or had to quarantine after exposure.

    Deploying enough firefighters, support staff and equipment to protect communities was always going to be tough this year, even without the delta surge. Fire risk has been high and many federal firefighting crews are understaffed, particularly in California.

    More than 5.5 million acres have burned nationwide so far in 2021, slightly below the nearly 6.1 million acres that had burned by this time last year, according to the National Interagency Fire Center, which coordinates nationwide firefighting efforts.

    As fall approaches, blazes aren’t letting up. “It looks much like it would in August, in the worst years,” said Jim Karels, fire director with the National Association of State Foresters.

    Fires have been so unrelenting that this year the United States could spend a record number of days under the national center’s two highest wildfire mobilization levels, Karels said, meaning most of the nation’s wildland firefighters, engines and other pieces of equipment are deployed.

    COVID-19 has added to the pressure. There have been several recent instances in Washington state where positive cases affected firefighting efforts, said Sarah Ford, communications director for Franz’s agency, in an email to Stateline.

    A federal crew headed to the Muckamuck fire recently had to turn back after crew members fell ill with the virus, Ford said. An air tanker at the Air Force base at Moses Lake had to be temporarily grounded after its crew tested positive, she said. And an entire leadership team battling the Walker Creek fire had to be replaced because of members testing positive.

    In her letter, Franz asked the two cabinet secretaries to require their firefighters to be vaccinated and make COVID-19 vaccinations available at fire camps they manage.

    Supply chain disruptions also have affected firefighting, Karels said. “It really started out with the impacts of logistics, of not enough truckers, of not enough people able to hire catering, supplies and fuel,” he said. Those problems have eased up somewhat as the year has gone on, he added.

    Spokespeople for federal firefighting agencies say employee safety is a top priority. They say agencies are requiring social distancing, masking, hand-washing and other safety measures at work.

    “We learned many lessons from the 2020 Fire Year about how to respond most effectively given the challenges brought on by the pandemic,” U.S. Forest Service spokesperson Babete Anderson wrote in an email to Stateline. “We have continued to employ those successful practices in our firefighting plans in 2021.”

    The Democratic governors of Oregon and Washington have moved to require state employees, including firefighters, to be vaccinated for COVID-19. Other Democratic Western governors, such as California Gov. Gavin Newsom, require state employees to be vaccinated or regularly tested for infection.

    Karels said firefighters may be falling ill after being exposed to COVID-19 elsewhere. “It’s been a tough summer when it comes to the delta variant and COVID across the country,” he said.

    The pandemic ultimately hasn’t prevented fire crews from getting the job done, he noted. “We haven’t had an event where, because of COVID, we haven’t been able to fight a fire.”

    Numbers detailing how many firefighters are ill or quarantined are hard to find.

    The National Wildfire Coordinating Group, which sets national wildfire operations standards, says on its website and in memos that managers of large wildfire incidents must report COVID-19 activity to a tracking system.

    Stanton Florea, a spokesperson for the National Interagency Fire Center, which fields questions about the coordinating group, said he wasn’t aware of any such tracking system. He referred Stateline to the Agriculture Department, which oversees the U.S. Forest Service, and to the Interior Department.

    A small fraction of Forest Service fire personnel have contracted the virus, spokesperson Anderson said. As of Sept. 4, the latest data available, 421 had tested positive in 2021, and 497 tested positive last year, she said. The agency typically employs 14,500 firefighters.

    The Interior Department, which usually has a staff of about 5,000 firefighters each year, declined to provide data on COVID-19 cases.

    Regional fire officials and front-line firefighters told Stateline that they’re hearing more about COVID-19 cases this year than last. At least a dozen fire crews — or members of crews — in California have had to quarantine this year, said a California-based U.S. Forest Service fire and aviation leader who spoke to Stateline anonymously for fear of reprisal from their employer.

    “I’ve heard of crews being stood down for upwards of two weeks at a time, and I’ve heard of crew members staying behind because they tested positive,” the official said. “It’s really all across the board.”

    The National Wildfire Coordinating Group’s health committee issued recommendations last year for reducing the spread of COVID-19 among fire personnel. The recommendations included everything from preventing crews from commingling to conducting briefings remotely and distributing boxed meals at fire camps to promote social distancing.

    Although those recommendations remain in place, as of this summer adherence has declined, according to a mid-July memo from the committee’s leader.

    “Currently, reports from the field indicate very limited application of … infection control measures (e.g. mask wearing, hand hygiene, physical distancing … ) taking place on incidents among any personnel,” wrote L. Kaili McCray, chair of the medical and public health advisory team.

    Both vaccinated and unvaccinated people should wear masks and keep their distance from one another, unless they’re actively engaged in fighting a fire, McCray advised. He declined to answer questions, referring Stateline to the National Interagency Fire Center’s communications team.

    Firefighters, like everyone else, were ready for life to return to normal in the spring and early summer, when COVID-19 cases were dropping and vaccination rates were rising, the California-based Forest Service official said. “In general, we’ve dropped our guard a bit.”

    The threat posed by the virus isn’t top of mind for most firefighters, the official said, because crews also face threats such as falling trees and extreme fire behavior on the job. “I would also say, as firefighters, and as managers of risk, on a day-to-day basis we have a higher tolerance for risk.”

    Firefighters are subject to different COVID-19 vaccination and testing requirements depending on their employer.

    U.S. Forest Service employees, for instance, must submit a form declaring their vaccination status and wear a mask on the job if they’re unvaccinated. Although unvaccinated federal employees are supposed to be tested regularly, the Agriculture Department doesn’t yet run a surveillance testing program.

    Those requirements will change. A federal task force is now hashing out the details of Biden’s new vaccine mandate for federal agency employees and contractors.

    Washington state, meanwhile, requires all state employees to get vaccinated by mid-October and to quarantine for 14 days after exposure to the virus. That’s a higher standard than the latest federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidance, which says local public health officials can allow exposed people who test negative for the virus to end their quarantines after seven days, and says that fully vaccinated people should get tested, but do not need to quarantine unless they have symptoms.

    There may still be a gap between official policies and what’s happening on the ground. Ben Elkind, a Forest Service smokejumper and a member of Grassroots Wildland Firefighters, an organization that advocates for federal wildland firefighters, said he hasn’t yet had time to fill out the vaccine attestation form. “Nobody’s talked to me about it at all, because I’ve been busy on fires,” he said.

    “I haven’t even seen a computer for a month,” he added in a later conversation.

    Recently assigned to the Bull Complex fire in Oregon, Elkind said he worked with people who’d been exposed to COVID-19, yet he couldn’t find an easy way to get tested on-site before heading home to his wife and two young kids. “I asked about testing, and there really wasn’t any way for me to get that done,” he said.

    A public information officer for the Bull Complex fire said in an email to Stateline that there have been only three confirmed cases of COVID-19 among fire personnel assigned to that fire so far (there are currently 594 people working on the fire, according to incident information posted online).

    Emergency test kits are available to firefighters, the officer said, though health facilities elsewhere offer the most accurate testing.

    It’s not clear whether the latest state and federal vaccine mandates will go into effect early enough to reduce the spread of COVID-19 among firefighters this fire season.

    Washington state’s October vaccination deadline, for instance, comes after the wildfire season typically ends there. Federal agencies should make sure their employees are fully vaccinated by Nov. 22, according to the latest guidance from the Biden administration’s COVID-19 safety task force.

    Unions that represent wildland firefighters also want to be able to negotiate the details of the new policies.

    CAL FIRE Local 2881, the union that represents employees of California’s state firefighting agency, has filed a complaint over Newsom’s July announcement that state workers be vaccinated or tested weekly for COVID-19.

    “We are not pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine. We believe that that’s an individual choice, and as a union, we shouldn’t be involved in a personal decision,” said CalFire Local 2881 President Tim Edwards. He said the union filed the complaint because it wants to be able to negotiate changes to working conditions.

    “We felt they did something without negotiating,” he said, “or even talking to the bargaining units or the unions.”

    And some firefighters may refuse vaccines, although it’s hard to say how many.

    Baumann said that internal surveys suggest that 70% of unionized Forest Service employees have been vaccinated. Although her unvaccinated members have been angry and vocal about having to follow additional safety protocols, she said, it’s important to remember that they’re in the minority.

    “It appears that those who are anti-vaccination, and anti-testing, are very loud,” she said. “So we have to make sure we listen to those voices that aren’t being so loud.”

    ©2021 The Pew Charitable Trusts. Visit at stateline.org. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.